Culture in the Cities: Provincial Academies During the Early Years of Louis XIV’s Reign
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contrary to the traditional interpretation that Louis XIV’s cultural absolutism included the establishment of provincial academies under the direction of the Académie Française, this article argues that men of letters in Caen, Soissons, Angers, Arles, and Nîmes spontaneously founded independent academies to satisfy their own interests in scholarship. These academies offered members a chance to exchange ideas, criticize each other’s work, and share their contacts with other men of letters outside their city. The provincial academicians struggled to define their institutions in ways that would combine their enjoyment of private intellectual camaraderie with their desire to enhance the social value of their talents in the local political arena. Provincial men of letters shared a common intellectual formation from their years in local collèges where they studied the ancient authors and developed a taste for rhetoric. They created a provincial cultural style which supported a greater diversity of literary genres, embraced the use of Latin, and continued the pursuit of scholarship in contrast to Parisian patterns of cultural activity. Provincial academicians negotiated with the crown on their own terms, and at different moments in their history, in order to formalize the place of their institutions in the realm of Louis XIV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".