MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2770868880 · doi:10.1088/1361-6463/aa9d79

A comparison of the magnetism of cobalt-, manganese-, and nickel-ferrite nanoparticles

2017· article· en· W2770868880 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics D Applied Physics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersLuonnontieteiden ja Tekniikan Tutkimuksen ToimikuntaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
KeywordsMagnetismManganeseCobaltNickelNanoparticleCobalt ferriteMaterials scienceFerrite (magnet)MetallurgyNanotechnologyCondensed matter physicsPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The microstructure, composition and magnetism of CoFe 2 O 4 , MnFe 2 O 4 and NiFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles of comparable sizes (∼20 nm) and interparticle spacings (∼20 nm) have been characterized from 10 to 400 K. The cation distributions of the tetrahedral and octahedral sites of the particles, that have cubic spinel structures, have a high degree of inversion, ∼0.98 for CoFe 2 O 4 , ∼0.80 for MnFe 2 O 4 and NiFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles. The blocking temperatures were ∼300 K for the MnFe 2 O 4 and NiFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles, while the CoFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles, due to their higher intrinsic anisotropy had a significantly higher blocking temperature above 400 K. Specifically, the magnetocrystalline anisotropy of the CoFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles was <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2.96</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.03</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>6</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mstyle> </mml:math> ergs cm −3 , while for the MnFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.04</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>6</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mstyle> </mml:math> ergs cm −3 , and for the NiFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.07</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>6</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mstyle> </mml:math> ergs cm −3 . The magnetism of these three ferrite systems are discussed in detail with regards to their microstructures and cation distributions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it