MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A hybrid designed digital dual-loop control of high power ground power unit (GPU)

2017· article· en· W2770906726 on OpenAlexaff
M. Nouri, Omid Salari, Keyvan Hashtrudi-Zaad, Alireza Bakhshai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeed forwardComputer scienceDual loopInverterElectronic engineeringInductorControl theory (sociology)Digital controlTransformerTotal harmonic distortionCascadeController (irrigation)VoltageEngineeringLoop (graph theory)Electrical engineeringControl engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

400 Hz inverters, known as Ground Power Units (GPUs), are widely used in aviation and marine industry. Due to their approximately eight times higher fundamental frequency, 400 Hz inverters are much more sensitive to practical delays such as sampling delays, when compared to traditional 50-60 Hz inverters. Conventional controllers designed for 50-60 Hz inverters, therefore, must be redesigned to properly address a different sampling rate issue. This paper proposes a modified dual cascade control loop applicable to 400 Hz inverters. The inverter topology has been modified by placing the filter inductor at the input side of transformer. Therefore, in the resulting configuration, the inductor current will serve as a new feedback variable with less harmonic content. The control system employs a proportional and a resonant controller designed in digital and analog domains, respectively, which is a new design approach compared to the existing methods resulting in enhanced performance of the 400 Hz GPU. In addition, a feedforward block has been added to the overall typical dual loop scheme to decouple the control variables from load current disturbances and improve the dynamic response of the inverter. An optimized smooth noise-robust derivative has also been introduced to improve the noise immunity. Simulations and experimental results on a 20 kVA prototype GPU show the validity of the proposed scheme to provide high-performance transient and steady state responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207