MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2771003681 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2017.2775224

Simultaneous Measurement of Temperature and Strain in a Dual-Core As<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>3</sub>-PMMA Taper

2017· article· en· W2771003681 on OpenAlexafffund
Song Gao, Chams Baker, Liang Chen, Xiaoyi Bao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials sciencePhysicsChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose and demonstrate an approach for high-sensitivity simultaneous temperature and strain measurement in a dual-core As2Se3-polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) taper. High measurement sensitivity is achieved by combining the large thermal-expansion coefficient of the PMMA cladding, the low stiffness of the micrometer diameter As2Se3core, and the large difference between the refractive indices of As2Se3and PMMA. High measurement sensitivities of -115 pm/°C and -4.21 pm/με are measured from the transmission spectrum of one principal polarization axis of the dual-core fiber, and -35.5 pm/°C and -3.16 pm/με are obtained from the transmission spectrum of the second polarization axis of the dualcore fiber. Decorrelation between the temperature and strain measurement sensitivities of the principal polarization axes is achieved through thermally induced squeezing of the As2Se3cores by the PMMA cladding due to an order of magnitude difference between the thermal-expansion coefficients of As2Se3and PMMA, enabling simultaneous measurement of temperature and strain variations with the temperature and strain uncertainty of 0.15°C and 1.87 με.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Photonics Technology LettersSame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207