Formation continue des enseignantes spécialisées en arts plastiques pour faire de l’école un espace inclusif, ouvert à l’autre et au monde | Professional Development of Art Teachers to Make School a Place that is Inclusive, Open to Others and the World
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: The article deals with a training program involving visual arts teachers and pedagogical advisors from the Montreal School Board (CSDM). The goal of collaborative research was to foster the development of new modes of practice by supporting female teachers in the development of art projects that combine contemporary art, intercultural education and student culture. In this research, we aimed to identify the elements that favor the integration of the intercultural dimension in the visual arts class or that constitute an obstacle. The results of the study highlight the importance of the appreciation of contemporary art as a lever for intercultural dialogue.Keywords: Current art; Artistic education ; Intercultural education; Professional development.Résumé : L’article traite d’un programme de formation impliquant des enseignantes en arts plastiques et des conseillères pédagogiques de la Commission scolaire de Montréal (CSDM). L’objectif de la recherche collaborative était de favoriser l'élaboration de nouveaux modes de pratiques en soutenant des enseignantes dans le développement de projets d'art qui conjuguent art actuel, éducation interculturelle et culture des élèves. Dans cette recherche, nous visions à identifier les éléments qui favorisent l’intégration de la dimension interculturelle en classe d’arts plastiques ou qui en constituent un obstacle. Les résultats de l’étude soulignent l’importance de l’appréciation de l’art actuel comme levier d’un dialogue interculturel.Mots clés : Art actuel ; Éducation artistique ; Éducation interculturelle ; Développement professionnel
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".