MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modelo calgary de avaliação familiar aplicado em contexto ribeirinho

2017· article· pt· W2771114133 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thaís Cristina Flexa Souza, Carla Monique Lavareda Costa, Jacira Nunes Carvalho

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Enfermagem UFPE on line · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth Education and Validation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUMOObjetivo: avaliar a dinâmica de uma família ribeirinha. Método: estudo qualitativo, tipo descritivo, realizado com uma família utilizando o Modelo Calgary de Avaliação Familiar (MCAF). Os dados foram obtidos por entrevista semiestruturada e analisados pela técnica de Análise de Conteúdo. Resultados: a aplicação deste Modelo investigou os principais aspectos de sua estrutura, desenvolvimento e funcionamento identificando os vínculos familiares, redes de apoio social e as funções diárias. Conclusão: o núcleo familiar estudado mostrou-se com vínculos fortes e relacionamento positivo, fortes redes de apoio social familiar e comunitário, porém com fragilidade com relação ao serviço de saúde, uma vez que os serviços oferecidos na ilha são incipientes e há dificuldade de locomoção da ilha para a busca de atendimento de saúde em outro local. O Modelo Calgary é uma ferramenta útil por considerar a família no seu contexto, além de ser um modelo próprio da enfermagem. Este estudo pode contribuir, futuramente, para que outros enfermeiros possam propor à família intervenções para a melhoria da qualidade de vida familiar, colaborando para encontrar soluções e lidar com as dificuldades do cotidiano. Descritores: Enfermagem de Família; Relações Familiares; Relações Profissional-Família; Família; Saúde da Família; Características da Família.ABSTRACTObjective: to evaluate the dynamics of a family living in the bank of a river. Method: qualitative and descriptive study performed with a family using the Calgary Family Assessment Model (CFAM). Data were obtained by semi-structured interview and analyzed by the Content Analysis technique. Results: the application of this model investigated the main aspects of its structure, development and functioning, identifying family ties, social support networks and daily functions. Conclusion: the family nucleus under study showed strong bonds and positive relationships, strong family and community social support networks, but with fragility in relation to the health service, since the services offered on the island are incipient and there is difficulty locomotion in the island to seek health care elsewhere. The Calgary Model is a useful tool for considering the family in its context, besides being a nursing model. This study may contribute, in the future, for other nurses to propose to the family interventions aimed to improve the quality of family life, collaborating to find solutions and deal with daily difficulties. Descriptors: Family Nursing; Family Relations; Professional-Family Relations; Family; Family Health; Family Characteristics.RESUMENObjetivo: evaluar la dinámica de una familia ribeirinha. Método: estudio cualitativo, tipo descriptivo, realizado con una familia utilizando el Modelo Calgary de Evaluación Familiar (MCAF). Los datos fueron obtenidos por entrevista semi-estructurada y analizados por la técnica de Análisis de Contenido. Resultados: la aplicación de este Modelo investigó los principales aspectos de su estructura, desarrollo y funcionamiento identificando los vínculos familiares, redes de apoyo social y las funciones diarias. Conclusión: el núcleo familiar estudiado se mostró con vínculos fuertes y relacionamiento positivo, fuertes redes de apoyo social familiar y comunitario, sin embargo con fragilidad con relación al servicio de salud, una vez que los servicios ofrecidos en la isla son incipientes y hay dificultad de locomoción de la isla para buscar atendimiento de salud en otro local. El Modelo Calgary es una herramienta útil por considerar a la familia en su contexto, además de ser un modelo propio de la enfermería. Este estudio puede contribuir, futuramente, para que otros enfermeros puedan proponer a la familia intervenciones para la mejoría de la calidad de vida familiar, colaborando para encontrar soluciones y lidiar con las dificultades del cotidiano. Descriptores: Enfermería de la Familia; Relaciones Familiares; Relaciones Profesional-Familia; Familia; Salud de la Familia; Composición Familiar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.305
GPT teacher head0.502
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Enfermagem UFPE on lineSame topicHealth Education and ValidationFrench-language works237,207