Characterization of the B-Center Defect in Diamond through the Vibrational Spectrum: A Quantum-Mechanical Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The B-center in diamond, which consists of a vacancy whose four first nearest-neighbors are nitrogen atoms, has been investigated at the quantum-mechanical level with an all-electron Gaussian-type basis set, hybrid functionals, and the periodic supercell approach. To simulate various defect concentrations, four cubic supercells have been considered, containing (before the creation of the vacancy) 64, 216, 512, and 1000 atoms, respectively. Whereas the B-center does not affect the Raman spectrum of diamond, several intense peaks appear in the IR spectrum, which should permit us to identify this defect. It turns out that of the seven peaks proposed by Sutherland in 1954, located at 328, 780, 1003, 1171, 1332, 1372, and 1426 cm –1, and frequently mentioned as fingerprints of the B center, the first one and the last three do not appear in the simulated spectrum at any concentration. The graphical animation of the modes confirms the attribution of the remaining three and also permits investigation of the nature of the full set of modes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".