Entangled evolutionary history of <i>Cuscuta pentagona</i> clade: A story involving hybridization and Darwin in the Galapagos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The distribution of Cuscuta subg. Grammica sect. Cleistogrammica (Cuscuta pentagona clade) is centered in North America (C. campestris, C. glabrior, C. harperi, C. pentagona, C. obtusiflora, C. plattensis, C. polygonorum, C. runyonii); however, long ‐distance dispersal was documented to Hawaii (C. sandwichiana), South America (C. gymnocarpa, C. stenolepis, and in part C. obtusiflora), Africa (C. bifurcata, C. schlechteri), Eurasia, and Australia (C. australis). Hybrid speciation has already been documented for some members of sect. Cleistogrammica (C. sandwichiana, C. bifurcata) but previous studies strongly suggested that the extent of reticulate evolution is underestimated in Cuscuta generally, and in this section in particular. Sequence data from the nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the plastid trnL‐F region were used to reconstruct the phylogeny and gain a better understanding of the evolutionary history within the clade. Additionally, a morphometric analysis was conducted to test the phenetic distinctiveness of a select number of species with taxonomic problems: C. campestris, C. glabrior, C. gymnocarpa, and C. pentagona. Discordances between phylogenies derived from plastid and nuclear data showed that C. campestris is a hybrid, likely involving the C. runyonii / glabrior lineage as a maternal progenitor and an undiscovered species as a paternal progenitor. This latter species, an extinct or unsampled lineage, was itself inferred to be a hybrid between C. pentagona / harperi and C. australis / obtusiflora / polygonorum lineages. Both the evolutionary and morphometric results clearly showed that C. campestris is a distinct species and the negative consequences of its amalgamation with C. pentagona during the last decades are discussed. Cuscuta gymnocarpa, an enigmatic species described from specimens collected by Darwin from the Galapagos, was inferred as conspecific with C. campestris and proposed as a variety of the latter. Because C. gymnocarpa is only a form of C. campestris, the possible means of dispersal of the latter species to the Galapagos are discussed. Cuscuta modesta, a new species discovered while studying the systematics of the clade, is described and illustrated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".