MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2771840278 · doi:10.1071/rdv30n1ab175

175 Testis-Specific Protein Y Encoded Copy Number Variation in In Vitro-Produced Bovine Early Embryos

2017· article· en· W2771840278 on OpenAlexaffabout
N. Y. Rho, Laura A. Favetta, T. Mogas, W.A. King

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphGreo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlastocystBiologyTestis determining factorAndrologyZygoteEmbryo cultureSemenEmbryoY chromosomeTheriogenologyReproductive technologyTransgenesisGeneticsSpermatogenesisGeneMolecular biologyEmbryogenesisEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Testis-specific protein Y (TSPY) is one of the genes located in the male-specific region of the Y chromosome involved in male reproduction, particularly in spermatogenesis. It has been shown to have different copy number (CN) in different species, in different individuals within a species and in the same family (i.e. among brothers from the same father). Previous studies from our laboratory in the bovine species showed that different TSPY CN was correlated with fertility, as bulls with higher CN showed higher fertility rate. In this study, we investigated development rate in in vitro-produced (IVP) bovine early embryos produced by sex-sorted semen (X and Y) from 3 bulls (1, 2, and 3) and TSPY copy number variation (CNV) in the male blastocysts. The IVP embryos by the 3 different types of semen (sub-divided: 1X, 1Y, 2X, 2Y, 3X, 3Y) and parthenotes (PART) for the negative control were assessed for developmental rates (shown in Table 1 below) and individually collected at each cell stage from zygote to blastocyst to extract DNA for TSPY CN analysis. The DNA from individual blastocysts was treated with a restriction enzyme for relative quantification of TSPY CN using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) with SRY, known to have only one copy in bovine, as a reference gene. Developmental data showed that Y-carrying semen had higher rates both in cleavage and blastocyst compared with X-carrying semen from the same bull. Particularly, bull 3 (both 3X and 3Y) had the highest developmental rates compared with the other 2 types of bulls. TSPY was detected in male blastocyst, where both parthenotes and female embryos were negative. Relative CN of TSPY versus SRY from blastocysts produced from bulls 1, 2, and 3 averaged to 87.5, 55, and 20, respectively. Interestingly, the CN among brother blastocysts showed a variation of less than 7.5, where bull-to-bull variation was approximately from 20 to 60 copies. Our results show that TSPY CN in the embryo varies according to the sire and among brother blastocysts. Moreover, TSPY CNV among brother blastocysts allows us to speculate that individually different recombination events occurred in meiosis during spermatogenesis. Table 1. Embryo development rate by semen type This research was funded by the Canada Research Chair’s program, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Ontario Veterinary College.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207