175 Testis-Specific Protein Y Encoded Copy Number Variation in In Vitro-Produced Bovine Early Embryos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Testis-specific protein Y (TSPY) is one of the genes located in the male-specific region of the Y chromosome involved in male reproduction, particularly in spermatogenesis. It has been shown to have different copy number (CN) in different species, in different individuals within a species and in the same family (i.e. among brothers from the same father). Previous studies from our laboratory in the bovine species showed that different TSPY CN was correlated with fertility, as bulls with higher CN showed higher fertility rate. In this study, we investigated development rate in in vitro-produced (IVP) bovine early embryos produced by sex-sorted semen (X and Y) from 3 bulls (1, 2, and 3) and TSPY copy number variation (CNV) in the male blastocysts. The IVP embryos by the 3 different types of semen (sub-divided: 1X, 1Y, 2X, 2Y, 3X, 3Y) and parthenotes (PART) for the negative control were assessed for developmental rates (shown in Table 1 below) and individually collected at each cell stage from zygote to blastocyst to extract DNA for TSPY CN analysis. The DNA from individual blastocysts was treated with a restriction enzyme for relative quantification of TSPY CN using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) with SRY, known to have only one copy in bovine, as a reference gene. Developmental data showed that Y-carrying semen had higher rates both in cleavage and blastocyst compared with X-carrying semen from the same bull. Particularly, bull 3 (both 3X and 3Y) had the highest developmental rates compared with the other 2 types of bulls. TSPY was detected in male blastocyst, where both parthenotes and female embryos were negative. Relative CN of TSPY versus SRY from blastocysts produced from bulls 1, 2, and 3 averaged to 87.5, 55, and 20, respectively. Interestingly, the CN among brother blastocysts showed a variation of less than 7.5, where bull-to-bull variation was approximately from 20 to 60 copies. Our results show that TSPY CN in the embryo varies according to the sire and among brother blastocysts. Moreover, TSPY CNV among brother blastocysts allows us to speculate that individually different recombination events occurred in meiosis during spermatogenesis. Table 1. Embryo development rate by semen type This research was funded by the Canada Research Chair’s program, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Ontario Veterinary College.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".