Synoviocytes-derived Interleukin 35 Potentiates B Cell Response in Patients with Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Elevated expression of interleukin 35 (IL-35) is associated with autoimmune disease, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The present study was undertaken to determine the functional interaction among IL-35, B cells, and stromal cells residing in the synovium of patients with RA and osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: IL-35 (EBI-3/p35) expression was investigated in RA and OA synovium using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry. IL-35 receptor (IL-35R) expression on B cells dissociated from synovium and periphery of patients with RA, OA, and healthy donor controls (HC) was determined by flow cytometry. The degree of B cells activation after IL-4 and/or IL-35 stimulation was measured by flow cytometry and qRT-PCR. Synovial fibroblasts (SF) purified from RA and OA synovium were cocultured with peripheral HC B cells in the presence/absence of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and with/without anti-IL-35-blocking antibodies. RESULTS: EBI-3/p35 transcripts were expressed in close proximity to B cells residing in RA and OA synovium. IL-35R subunits, gp130 and IL-27Rα, but not IL-12Rβ2, were expressed in B cells extracted from the synovium and periphery of patients with RA/OA. Notably, RA synovium expressed the highest level of IL-27Rα on their cell surface. IL-35 induced proliferation and IgG production in HC B cells. Cocultures of HC B cells with RASF, but not OASF, exhibited significantly elevated B cells activation. TNF-α-induced, RASF-dependent secretion of IgG in B cells is partly IL-35-dependent. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, for the first time we demonstrated that synovial/peripheral B cells expressed IL-35R and were responsive to IL-35 stimulation. SF residing in RA synovium can be linked to B cell activation and maintenance in RA synovium through IL-35.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".