Effect of a Concurrent Well-Rounded Exercise Training Using a Floor-Based Exercise Station in Older Women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To evaluate the effects of a 12-wk circuit exercise training program using the floor-based exercise station (FBES) on aerobic fitness, strength, and balance in older women. Participants were divided into: FBES exercise group (EX: n=22; 68.1±6.5 yr) and a non-exercise control group (CN: n=18; 68.2±5.7 yr). EX participated in a 12-wk circuit training program, 3 d/wk for 50 min/d, consisting of warm-up exercise (10 min), circuit training (30 min), and cool-down/relaxation exercise (10 min). Twelve strength and balance exercises and 12 aerobic dance exercises were performed alternatively for 30s each with a heart rate of 100-110 bpm. CN continued normal physical activity patterns. After 12-wk, all measurements were repeated in both groups. Compared to CN, EX increased (p<0.05) arm curl (12.6%), timed up-and-go (－8.7%), 12-min walk (5.4%), predict VO2max (6.3%), sit-and-reach (24.3%), and back scratch (271.5%), but not balance parameters. Incorporating both aerobic and resistance training via the FBES improves multiple aspects of fitness but not balance. These results are similar to those from larger, more expensive hydraulic exercise machines. This study supports the efficacy of the FBES for older adults and implementation is feasible in multiple settings as it is relatively inexpensive and requires little space.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".