Evaluation of four surgical implantation techniques for age‐0 white sturgeon ( <i>Acipenser transmontanus</i> Richardson, 1836) with a new acoustic transmitter
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of this study was to evaluate four implantation techniques by assessing transmitter retention, survival, growth, and wound healing responses in white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus Richardson, 1836). A new acoustic transmitter (AT; cylindrical, 0.7 g in air, 24.2 × 5.0 mm, up to 365 days battery life) was developed to monitor age-0 sturgeon; however, an implantation technique is critical to provide guidance for its use in field research. Sturgeon (n = 150, 182–289 mm fork length, 35–116 g) were separated into five treatments (n = 30 per treatment): (i) control, (ii) flank incision with one suture, (iii) flank incision without a suture, (iv) offline incision with one suture, and (v) offline incision without a suture. Fish were implanted with a non-functioning AT and observed for 28 days. Transmitter retention was 100% and only fish in the offline incision without a suture treatment had reduced growth (0.15% mm growth per day) compared to controls (0.38%) over the 28 days study. Suturing caused an increase in incision inflammation, ulceration, and water mold infection. Offline incisions were more susceptible to varicosities than flank incisions. Non-sutured incisions showed greater incision openness, but only during the first 14 days post-implantation. A flank incision without a suture is recommended for implanting this new AT in age-0 white sturgeon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it