Capsular needle biopsy as a pre-operative diagnostic test for peri-prosthetic shoulder infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Establishing the diagnosis of peri-prosthetic shoulder infection prior to revision shoulder arthroplasty can be difficult. The objectives of the present study were (i) to describe the technique of fluoroscopic capsular needle biopsy for the diagnosis of peri-prosthetic shoulder infection and (ii) to determine the feasibility and preliminary accuracy of the test in a pilot sample of patients undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: Eighteen patients, comprising eight females and nine males with a mean age of 61 years (range 37 years to 81 years) underwent capsular needle biopsy during the work-up of suspected chronic arthroplasty-related glenohumeral infection. Intra-operative tissue samples were taken from a minimum of three regions of the joint capsule during revision surgery. Standard serum indices were obtained. RESULTS: Of 17 patients with possible infection, five had confirmed culture positive infections based on intra-operative biopsies. Of these five patients, four (80%) had positive cultures from fluoroscopic capsular needle biopsy, with matching cultures. There were no complications. No culture-positive patients had elevated serum indices for infection. CONCLUSIONS: Level II: diagnostic test.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".