MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773017822 · doi:10.5539/jas.v10n1p152

Sample Size for Morphological Traits of Sunn Hemp

2017· article· en· W2773017822 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Denison Esequiel Schabarum, Alberto Cargnelutti Filho, André Lavezo, Diego Nicolau Follmann, Jéssica Andiara Kleinpaul, Gabriela Görgen Chaves, Rafael Vieira Pezzini

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGrowth and nutrition in plants
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSowingCropBiologySample size determinationAgronomyField trialConfidence intervalCrotalaria junceaCrop yieldMathematicsHorticultureStatisticsGreen manure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea L.) is an annual leguminous plant used for crop rotation, biomass formation, biological nitrogen fixation, and nematode control. To this end, sampling is an important tool owing to its advantages, such as low cost and fast data acquisition. This study aimed to determine the sample size required to estimate the mean morphological traits of sunn hemp and to assess sample size variability among traits, crop development stages, and sowing seasons. Two uniformity trials were performed in the field during the 2014/2015 harvest. Crops were sown in October and December on an experimental area of the Department of Crop Science at the Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil. An area of 1,200 m2 was allocated for each trial. Each trial was divided into 2 m × 2 m grids, which formed 25 rows and 12 columns. One plant was marked per plot, totaling 300 plants in each trial. Leaf number and plant height were assessed weekly. Stem diameter and root length were measured at flowering. Normality and randomness tests were performed on each trait. The sample sizes (plants number) were calculated for the confidence interval half-widths (estimation errors) of the 2, 4, …, 20% mean estimates. There is variability of the sample size (plants number) between morphological traits, crop development stages, and sowing seasons. When choosing a single sample size to evaluate the morphological traits of sunn hemp, at least 70 plants should be sampled for an accuracy of 10% and a 95% confidence level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicGrowth and nutrition in plantsFrench-language works237,207