MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773039928 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2017.8216276

Transformerless single-phase UPQC for large scale LED lighting networks

2017· article· en· W2773039928 on OpenAlexaff
Radwa M. Abdalaal, Carl Ngai Man Ho

Bibliographic record

VenueIECON 2017 - 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlickerHarmonicsHarmonicAC powerVoltagePower factorComputer scienceElectronic engineeringLED lampPower (physics)Harmonic analysisThree-phaseEngineeringElectrical engineeringAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents a comprehensive Power Quality (PQ) solution to improve grid current harmonics and light intensity flickers in large scale LED lighting networks. Low cost and low power LED lamps exhibit current harmonic contents due to their nonlinear characteristics. A large scale lighting network requires tens to hundreds LED lamps installation, the resultant harmonic currents pollute the grid seriously. Furthermore, Light intensity fluctuations are becoming a concern nowadays to many users, as safety and health problems. This phenomenon is mainly caused by heavy loads as they lead to voltage fluctuations and deteriorating in PQ and hence visual flickering in LED lamps. This paper proposes a single phase transformerless half-bridge unified power quality conditioner (UPQC) topology with its controls to mitigate most of PQ problems in a network. An active power filter injects harmonic currents and reactive current to provide unity power factor and a dynamic voltage restorer quickly supports the load voltage for any voltage dip, swell or flickering in the network. The performance of the proposed UPQC has been verified by simulations, and small signal models have been determined. A 500VA/120V prototype has been built to verify the models. Experimental results, steady-state characteristics and stability study are given in the paper. The experimental results have a good agreement with the theoretical findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIECON 2017 - 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics SocietySame topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207