Food allergy in canines: A review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Food allergy is an immunological response to the ingested allergen present in food like artificial food additives, beef, canned foods, corn, cow milk, dairy products, dog foods, dog biscuits, eggs, fish, and food preservatives, meat of different species including pork, mutton and horse meat, oat meal, potatoes, rice and commonly occurs in dogs and cats. Among all canine species, Labrador and German shepherd were found to be more prone to food allergy and symptoms are similar to other pruritic skin diseases. These food allergies are broadly classified into two categories (1) IgE-mediated food allergy (2) non-IgE-mediated food allergy. Diagnosis can be done by accurate clinical history, parental observations, and laboratory tests: Skin scrapping, bacterial/fungal culture examination, thyroid test, fecal examination and skin biopsy, allergic tests: Patch test, Skin Prick Test, Intra-dermal test and Radioallergosorbent test. Management of these allergies can be done by antihistaminics like Hydroxyzine and Chlorpheniramine, antibiotics like Cephalexin, Enrofloxacin, antifungals like Ketoconazole, Griseofulvin, Amphotericin-B and glucocorticoids like Prednisolone, Methyl prednisolone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".