Tectonic setting of the Late Triassic magmatism in the Qinling Orogen: New constraints from the interplay between granite emplacement and shear zone deformation in the Shagou area
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multidisciplinary studies of the Baliping granite pluton and the Shagou shear zone (East Qinling Orogen, Central China) have been conducted to reconstruct the emplacement and deformation processes of the Baliping pluton, to explore the relationship between granite pluton and shear zone deformation, and further to constrain the tectonic setting of the Late Triassic magmatism in the Qinling Orogen which remains controversial. Zircon U–Pb geochronology studies confirmed that the Baliping granites and the protolithes of the Shagou granitic mylonites crystallized from the same magmas at ca. 221 Ma since the two nearly have the same zircon U–Pb ages and Ti–in–zircon temperatures. Meanwhile, the 210 Ma of metamorphic zircons and the 201 Ma of syntectonic granitic vein provide precise limits on the timing of synkinematic deformation in response to Late Triassic orogeny. Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility, microstructural observation, and shape preferred orientation were combined to study the internal structures. New fabrics datasets display a high degree of coupling between the Baliping pluton and the Shagou shear zone, indicating a syntectonic emplacement of the pluton. Microstructural data suggest that the magmatic to high‐temperature solid‐state deformation is a continuum process in which the fabrics were mainly acquired. We propose an integrated syntectonic emplacement model of the Baliping pluton, in which the shear zone deformation (sinistral transpression) play a significant role on the emplacement of the magma by creating rooms. Emplacement of the pluton, in turn, triggers the nucleation of Shagou shear zone by providing the protoliths and the heat. On the basis of this study, we argued that the Qinling Orogen was still under the convergent setting during 221–201 Ma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".