MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773179161 · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007066

CNGCs break through—A rice cyclic nucleotide-gated channel paves the way for pollen tube growth

2017· letter· en· W2773179161 on OpenAlexafffund
Wolfgang Moeder, Keiko Yoshioka

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS Genetics · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Reproductive Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsBiologyPollen tubePollenChannel (broadcasting)NucleotideTube (container)GeneticsBotanyGeneTelecommunicationsMaterials scienceComputer sciencePollination

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lower plants generate mobile sperm cells that must reach their female counterparts by swimming. This requirement for water is a disadvantage for these plants as compared with angiosperms, for which the dry pollen attaches to a stigma and becomes hydrated, enabling the emerging pollen tube to grow in the protected environment of the pistil. After adhesion, hydration, and germination of the pollen at the stigmatic papilla cells, the pollen tube enters the stigma and grows in the intercellular space between papilla cells towards the style and transmission tract (TT). The TT contains a nutrient-rich extracellular matrix (ECM) and guides the pollen tube to the ovary. After penetrating the septum, the pollen tube grows through the funiculus and then enters the ovule though the micropyle to deliver the two nonflagellate sperm cells to the two female gametes, leading to double fertilization, a prerequisite to seed formation The 2017 study by Xu et al. [2] reveals, for the first time, the importance of a Ca 2+ signal generated by rice cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 13 (OsCNGC13) in the pistil to induce programmed cell death (PCD), which facilitates proper pollen tube growth. Furthermore, they showed this step significantly affects the yield of rice grains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS GeneticsSame topicPlant Reproductive BiologyFrench-language works237,207