MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773210151 · doi:10.1096/fj.201701031r

Competitive apnea and its effect on the human brain: focus on the redox regulation of blood‐brain barrier permeability and neuronal‐parenchymal integrity

2017· article· en· W2773210151 on OpenAlexafffund
Anthony R. Bain, Philip N. Ainslie, Ryan L. Hoiland, Otto Barak, Ivan Drviš, Mike Stembridge, Douglas M. MacLeod, Jane McEneny, Benjamin S. Stacey, Édouard Tuaillon, Nicola Marchi, Alexis Fayd’herbe de Maudave, Željko Dujić, David B. MacLeod, Damian M. Bailey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British ColumbiaInterior Health
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHrvatska Zaklada za ZnanostCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsParenchymaBlood–brain barrierNeurosciencePermeability (electromagnetism)RedoxApneaChemistryMedicinePathologyBiologyCentral nervous systemInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Static apnea provides a unique model that combines transient hypertension, hypercapnia, and severe hypoxemia. With apnea durations exceeding 5 min, the purpose of the present study was to determine how that affects cerebral free‐radical formation and the corresponding implications for brain structure and function. Measurements were obtained before and following a maximal apnea in 14 divers with transcerebral exchange kinetics, measured as the product of global cerebral blood flow (duplex ultrasound) and radial arterial to internal jugular venous concentration differences ( a ‐ v D ). Apnea increased the systemic (arterial) and, to a greater extent, the regional (jugular venous) concentration of the ascorbate free radical, resulting in a shift from net cerebral uptake to output ( P < 0.05). Peroxidation (lipid hydroperoxides, LDL oxidation), NO bioactivity, and S100β were correspondingly enhanced ( P < 0.05), the latter interpreted as minor and not a pathologic disruption of the blood‐brain barrier. However, those changes were insufficient to cause neuronal‐parenchymal damage confirmed by the lack of change in the a‐v D of neuron‐specific enolase and human myelin basic protein ( P > 0.05). Collectively, these observations suggest that increased cerebral oxidative stress following prolonged apnea in trained divers may reflect a functional physiologic response, rather than a purely maladaptive phenomenon.— Bain, A. R., Ainslie, P. N., Hoiland, R. L., Barak, O. F., Drvis, I., Stembridge, M., MacLeod, D. M., McEneny, J., Stacey, B. S., Tuaillon, E., Marchi, N., De Maudave, A. F., Dujic, Z., MacLeod, D. B., Bailey, D. M. Competitive apnea and its effect on the human brain: focus on the redox regulation of blood‐brain barrier permeability and neuronal‐parenchymal integrity. FASEB J. 32, 2305–2314 (2018). www.fasebj.org

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207