MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773225668 · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2017.12.002

The potential role of IDEAL MRI for identification of lipids and hemorrhage in carotid artery plaques

2017· article· en· W2773225668 on OpenAlexaff
Faisal Khosa, Rachel E. Clough, Xiaoen Wang, Ananth J. Madhuranthakam, Robert L. Greenman

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Resonance Imaging · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersU.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition ActivityConsortia for Improving Medicine with Innovation and Technology
KeywordsMedicineStenosisAsymptomaticStroke (engine)Blood lipidsInternal medicineCardiologyRadiologyNuclear medicineCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hemorrhage and lipid deposits contribute to instability in atherosclerotic plaques. Unstable carotid artery plaques can lead to cerebral ischemic events. While MRI studies have shown the ability to identify plaque components, the identification of hemorrhage and lipids has proven to be problematic. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the potential of the MRI fat/water separation method known as iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least squares estimation (IDEAL) to complement and improve existing methods for the identification of hemorrhage and lipids in carotid artery plaques. Fifteen asymptomatic subjects with 50-79% stenosis of at least one carotid artery were enrolled. Hemorrhage and lipid components within carotid plaques were identified using previously published criteria based on the multiple contrast-weighted (MCW) method (3D Time-of-Flight (3D-TOF), T1-Weighted (T1W) and T2-Weighted (T2W)). The hemorrhage:muscle, lipid:muscle and intra-plaque lipid:hemorrhage signal intensity ratios (SIR) and contrast to noise ratios (CNR) were measured on MCW and compared to IDEAL black-blood images. No differences were found between any of the MCW methods for any of the SIRs measured. The IDEAL Fat images had higher lipid:muscle and lipid/hemorrhage SIRs (p<0.001) compared to IDEAL Water and all MCW image sequence types. The mean values of IDEAL Fat hemorrhage:muscle SIR and CNR were nearly unity (1.1±0.6) and nearly zero (0.1±1.1), respectively. The IDEAL Water imaging was not significantly different than any of the MCW methods for any of the SIRs or for the hemorrhage:muscle CNR of 3D-TOF, while its CNRs were significantly higher than IDEAL Fat lipid:muscle (p<0.05) and lipid:hemorrhage (p<0.001) and all MCW methods (p<0.001). The addition of IDEAL Water and Fat imaging to the MCW method shows potential to improve the identification of hemorrhage and lipid structures in carotid artery plaques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagnetic Resonance ImagingSame topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesFrench-language works237,207