MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773392232 · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.11.032

Improvement of the association between self-reported pill count and varenicline levels following exclusion of participants with misreported pill count: A commentary on Peng et al. (2017)

2017· article· en· W2773392232 on OpenAlexafffund
Annie R. Peng, Bernard Le Foll, Mark Morales, Caryn Lerman, Robert A. Schnoll, Rachel F. Tyndale

Bibliographic record

VenueAddictive Behaviors · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedication Adherence and Compliance
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthNational Human Genome Research InstituteUniversity of TorontoNational Institute on Drug AbuseCanada Research ChairsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCentre for Addiction and Mental Health Foundation
KeywordsPillVareniclineMedicineInternal medicinePharmacologyNicotine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.034
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.189
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0340.189
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.005
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0070.004
Research integrity0.0630.082
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAddictive BehaviorsSame topicMedication Adherence and ComplianceFrench-language works237,207