MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773490519 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23114

Effect of phenolic compounds on bioconversion of glucose to ethanol by yeast <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> PE‐2

2017· article· en· W2773490519 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bruna Lyra Colombi, P. R. S. Zanoni, Lorena Benathar Ballod Tavares

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsSyringaldehydeBioconversionVanillinYeastChemistryFermentationFood scienceSyringic acidAcetosyringoneLignosulfonatesEthanolEthanol fermentationEthanol fuelBiochemistryLigninOrganic chemistryTransformation (genetics)Gallic acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomasses to ethanol consists of three main steps: pre‐treatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, and fermentation by microorganisms. Most pre‐treatments induce the formation of substances with a potential inhibitory effect on the microbial metabolism, which may hinder the process. The objective of this study was to investigate the behaviour of Saccharomyces cerevisiae PE‐2 yeast in the presence of four phenolic compounds (vanillin, syringaldehyde, syringic acid, and acetosyringone) resulting from the alkaline pre‐treatment of eucalyptus with green liquor. Eucalyptus is a fast‐growing tree, widely exploited by the paper and pulp industry in Brazil. It was observed that yeast growth and glucose assimilation were affected to an extent directly proportional to the initial amount of vanillin in the medium. Syringaldehyde in a concentration of 1.0 g/L had an adverse effect on the fermentation parameters related to ethanol production, which exhibited a decrease of approximately 50 %. When syringic acid and acetosyringone were used, although the cell growth and glucose consumption profiles were similar to those of the control, they inhibited the conversion at concentrations of 0.1 and 1.0 g/L.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicBiofuel production and bioconversionFrench-language works237,207