Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1996, the then Gwich'in Social and Cultural Institute (GSCI) in the Northwest Territories, Canada, published a strategic plan entitled Into the Next Millennium. 1 Th e plan outlined projects the GSCI wished to undertake from 1996 to 2001 that would help achieve their mandate to "document, preserve and promote the practice of Gwich'in culture, language, traditional knowledge and values."One of the identifi ed projects was "Biographies of Prominent Elders." In preparing the strategy, the GSCI Board and Elders in the four Gwich'in communities of Aklavik, Inuvik, Fort McPherson, and Tsiigehtchic had expressed their wish that this project be undertaken.Th e Elders wanted their grandchildren to know their stories so the children would learn about and take pride in their traditional culture.Th e Elders also wanted a larger audience to learn about and from them, and to know their history.Th e goal of the project was to publish the stories, hopefully in a variety of ways such as a large book, a series of children's books based on themes, individual biographies of each Elder, or in journals for broader audiences.Th e GSCI asked
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.144 | 0.048 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".