MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2773938188 · doi:10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.tmp7

Abstract TMP7: Endovascular Stroke Therapy Abrogates Sex-Related Differences in Recanalization in Acute Ischemic Stroke

2017· article· en· W2773938188 on OpenAlexaff
Sunil A. Sheth, Steven Warach, Jan Gralla, Reza Jahan, Mayank Goyal, Raul G. Nogueira, Osama Zaidat, Vítor Mendes Pereira, Adnan H. Siddiqui, Helmi L. Lutsep, David S. Liebeskind, Louise D. McCullough, Jeffrey L. Saver

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSolitaire Cryptographic AlgorithmStroke (engine)Modified Rankin ScaleAtrial fibrillationInternal medicineCardiologySurgeryIschemic strokeIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Ischemic stroke affects women differently than men. Prior studies evaluating recanalization treatment with IV tpA showed that while women are more likely to achieve recanalization, there are strong sex disparities with respect to clinical outcome. We evaluated the effect of endovascular stroke therapy (ET) on recanalization and outcomes in women versus men. Methods: In the combined databases of the SWIFT, STAR, and SWIFT-PRIME trials, we identified patients treated with the Solitaire stent retriever to determine the effects of sex on recanalization and clinical outcome. Results: Among 389 patients treated with ET, mean age was 67±13, 55% were female, and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 17 [8-28]. There were no differences between females vs. males in presentation NIHSS (17 vs. 17, p=0.21), occlusion location (69% vs. 64% M1, p=0.62), or ASPECTS score (9 vs. 8, p=0.24). Rates of successful TICI 2b/3 recanalization were nearly identical (87% vs. 83%, p=0.374). There were no differences in onset to recanalization time (OTR) (277 vs. 306, p=0.46), procedural time (44 vs. 48 minutes, p=0.23), number of stent-retriever passes (1.7 vs. 1.8, p=0.17), rate of PH2 hemorrhage (1.9% vs. 1.1%, p=0.70), or functional independence at 90 days (53% vs. 56%, p=0.54). In ordinal multivariate analysis, collateral grade (OR 1.4, p=0.007) but not sex, age, or history of atrial fibrillation predicted improved TICI recanalization. In logistic (Figure) and ordinal regression analysis, the impact of delayed OTR was no different between men and women (1% versus 1.2% likelihood of worsened mRS outcome per 5 minute delay, p=0.27). Conclusions: In our prospective multicenter randomized cohort of nearly 400 patients undergoing ET, presentation and treatment characteristics of women were similar to men. Women were equally likely to achieve successful recanalization and good clinical outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→