MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2773974036 · doi:10.1002/mp.12717

Absorbed dose kernel and self‐shielding calculations for a novel radiopaque glass microsphere for transarterial radioembolization

2017· article· en· W2773974036 on OpenAlexafffund
Cody Church, George Mawko, John Paul Archambault, Robert J. Lewandowski, David Liu, Sharon Kehoe, Daniel Boyd, Robert J. Abraham, Alasdair Syme

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaNational Research Council CanadaGreenfield Research (Canada)Nova Scotia Health AuthorityDalhousie University
FundersNational Research Council CanadaBeatrice Hunter Cancer Research Institute
KeywordsGlass microsphereMicrosphereAbsorbed doseDosimetryElectromagnetic shieldingMaterials scienceNeutronMonte Carlo methodNuclear medicineKernel (algebra)PhysicsNuclear physicsMedicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Radiopaque microspheres may provide intraprocedural and postprocedural feedback during transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Furthermore, the potential to use higher resolution x‐ray imaging techniques as opposed to nuclear medicine imaging suggests that significant improvements in the accuracy and precision of radiation dosimetry calculations could be realized for this type of therapy. This study investigates the absorbed dose kernel for novel radiopaque microspheres including contributions of both short and long‐lived contaminant radionuclides while concurrently quantifying the self‐shielding of the glass network. Methods Monte Carlo simulations using EGSnrc were performed to determine the dose kernels for all monoenergetic electron emissions and all beta spectra for radionuclides reported in a neutron activation study of the microspheres. Simulations were benchmarked against an accepted 90Y dose point kernel. Self‐shielding was quantified for the microspheres by simulating an isotropically emitting, uniformly distributed source, in glass and in water. The ratio of the absorbed doses was scored as a function of distance from a microsphere. The absorbed dose kernel for the microspheres was calculated for (a) two bead formulations following (b) two different durations of neutron activation, at (c) various time points following activation. Results Self‐shielding varies with time postremoval from the reactor. At early time points, it is less pronounced due to the higher energies of the emissions. It is on the order of 0.4–2.8% at a radial distance of 5.43 mm with increased size from 10 to 50 μm in diameter during the time that the microspheres would be administered to a patient. At long time points, self‐shielding is more pronounced and can reach values in excess of 20% near the end of the range of the emissions. Absorbed dose kernels for 90Y, 90mY, 85mSr, 85Sr, 87mSr, 89Sr, 70Ga, 72Ga, and 31Si are presented and used to determine an overall kernel for the microspheres based on weighted activities. The shapes of the absorbed dose kernels are dominated at short times postactivation by the contributions of 70Ga and 72Ga. Following decay of the short‐lived contaminants, the absorbed dose kernel is effectively that of 90Y. After approximately 1000 h postactivation, the contributions of 85Sr and 89Sr become increasingly dominant, though the absorbed dose‐rate around the beads drops by roughly four orders of magnitude. Conclusions The introduction of high atomic number elements for the purpose of increasing radiopacity necessarily leads to the production of radionuclides other than 90Y in the microspheres. Most of the radionuclides in this study are short‐lived and are likely not of any significant concern for this therapeutic agent. The presence of small quantities of longer lived radionuclides will change the shape of the absorbed dose kernel around a microsphere at long time points postadministration when activity levels are significantly reduced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Physics→Same topicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis→French-language works237,207→