MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2774095566 · doi:10.1525/irqr.2011.4.4.335

Awakenings

2011· article· en· W2774095566 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Review of Qualitative Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChildren's Rights and Participation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrassrootsAgency (philosophy)PsychologySpace (punctuation)ConsciousnessDreamGender studiesTransition (genetics)SociologySocial psychologyDevelopmental psychologySocial sciencePolitical sciencePoliticsPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poulos (2010) states that “performance is a gradual awakening” (p. 211). Parenthood, on the other hand, can be a very rude awakening indeed. This performance piece on parenthood and the significance of first-time parenting groups, is full of awakenings, both gradual and rude. Drawing upon 24 interviews with members of grassroots “mothers' groups”, this performance piece explores the researcher as first time mother, existing in the space “between awakening and full consciousness, between dream and everyday reality, between inspiration and creation” (p. 212). We use performance, as Alexander and Myers (2010) describe, to “rehearse possibilities of transformation, intervention, and change” (p. 264); specifically, we propose a structured postnatal program through the Public Health Agency of Canada that will assist in the formation of mothers' (or parents') groups to help ease the transition to parenthood. We also use this performance piece to represent motherhood “from within”. As Nelson (2009) argues, “Motherhood is a topic of interest in many disciplines, but much of the mass information about motherhood talks around motherhood, about motherhood, without speaking of motherhood from within it” (p. 14, original emphasis). For, performance and motherhood have at least one thing in common: “After, one is never the same” (Pelias, 2010, p. 173).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.708
GPT teacher head0.676
Teacher spread0.032 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it