A rabbit model of progressive chronic right ventricular pressure overload
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Right ventricular (RV) failure from increased pressure loading is a frequent consequence of acquired and congenital heart diseases. However, the mechanisms involved in their pathophysiology are still unclear, and few data exist on RV pressure-loading models and early versus late effects on RV and left ventricular responses. We characterized a rabbit model of chronic RV pressure overload and early-late effects on biventricular function. METHODS: Twenty-one New Zealand white rabbits were randomized into 3 groups: (i) sham, (ii) pulmonary artery (PA) banding (PAB) for 3 weeks (PAB3W) and (iii) PAB for 6 weeks (PAB6W). Progressive RV pressure overload was created by serial band inflation using an adjustable device. Molecular, echocardiographic and haemodynamic studies were performed. RESULTS: RV pressure overload was achieved with clinical manifestations of RV failure. Heart and liver weights were significantly higher after PAB. PAB-induced echocardiographic ventricular remodelling increased wall thickness and stress and ventricular dilation. Cardiac output (ml/min) (sham 172.4 ± 42.86 vs PAB3W 103.1 ± 23.14 vs PAB6W 144 ± 60.9, P = 0.0027) and systolic and diastolic functions decreased; with increased RV end-systolic and end-diastolic pressures (mmHg) (sham 1.6 ± 0.66 vs PAB3W 3.9 ± 1.8 vs PAB6W 5.2 ± 2.2, P = 0.0103), despite increased contractility [end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (mmHg/ml), sham 3.76 ± 1.76 vs PAB3W 12.21 ± 3.44 vs PAB6W 19.4 ± 6.88, P < 0.0001]. Functional parameters further worsened after PAB6W versus PAB3W. LV contractility increased in both the PAB groups, despite worsening of other invasive measures of systolic and diastolic functions. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a novel, unique model of chronic RV pressure overload leading to early biventricular dysfunction and fibrosis with further progression at 6 weeks. These findings can aid in guiding management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".