Exploring ethnic identity and its development process among young adult Filipino Americans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study is intended to improve understanding of the development of ethnic identity among young adult Filipino Americans aged 18–24, a stage typically marked by independence and autonomy. There is a great need to expand research on the young adult Filipino population, which is part of the second largest Asian immigrant population in the United States. The purpose of this qualitative study with individual interviews is to explore the process of ethnic identity development in this group. The study sample recruited through convenience and snowball sampling methods consisted of 13 young adult Filipino Americans living in the San Francisco Bay area. The key findings emphasize that the participants’ ethnic identity formed through a continuous, nonlinear process influenced by various environmental factors, such as family, peers, and social groups. Through family values and dynamics, the participants have learned the values of respect and collectivity, which positively influenced the process of ethnic identity development. Through involvement in peer and social groups, the participants developed pride and a sense of community, which affirmed their ethnic identity. The study findings contribute to and expand research on the ethnic identity of young adult Filipino Americans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".