MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2774426387 · doi:10.1063/1.5013031

A high-pressure metallic core holder for magnetic resonance based on Hastelloy-C

2017· article· en· W2774426387 on OpenAlexafffund
Mojtaba Shakerian, Florea Marica, Armin Afrough, Frédéric G. Goora, Ming Li, Sarah Vashaee, Bruce J. Balcom

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNMR spectroscopy and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersSaudi AramcoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsGovernment of CanadaConocoPhillips
KeywordsMaterials scienceMagnetic fieldEddy currentCore (optical fiber)MagnetNuclear magnetic resonanceElectrical conductorComposite materialElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A metallic core holder, fabricated from non-magnetic Hastelloy-C276, has been designed for Magnetic Resonance (MR) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of core plug samples at high pressures and temperatures. Core plug samples, 1.5″ in diameter and 2″ in length, can be tested in the core holder at elevated pressures and temperatures, up to 5000 psi and 80 °C. These are conditions commonly found in petroleum reservoirs. A radio frequency probe, which excites and detects magnetic resonance signals, was placed inside the metal vessel. Proximity to the sample improves the signal to noise ratio of the resulting measurements. The metallic core holder is positioned between the poles of a 0.2 T permanent magnet and subjected to rapidly switched magnetic field gradients as part of the imaging process. This switching induces eddy currents on the conductive core holder, which degrades the magnetic field gradient waveform in the sample space. The low electrical-conductivity of Hastelloy-C276 minimizes the duration and the magnitude of such eddy currents. A recently developed pre-equalization technique was employed to ensure that magnetic field gradient pulses, required for MRI, are near ideal in the sample space. A representative core flooding experiment was undertaken in conjunction with MR/MRI measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicNMR spectroscopy and applicationsFrench-language works237,207