MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2774450352 · doi:10.51644/krpj2411

Women, Priests and the Anglican Church in Southern Africa: Reformation of Holy Hierarchies

2017· article· en· W2774450352 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConsensus · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicChristian Theology and Mission
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistorySociologyReligious studiesAncient historyGeographyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Anglican Church in Southern Africa (ACSA) is celebrating the twenty-fifth
\nanniversary of the ordination of women to the priesthood in 2017. The quotation
\nabove is a statement made by the South African Council of Churches following the
\nannouncement that the Anglican Church in Southern Africa voted in favour of the
\nordination of women at the church’s September, 1992 Provincial Synod. This was a
\nnewsworthy event given the currents of change and rhetoric of freedom in apartheid
\nSouth Africa. Under the heading “Women priests for SA” the Cape Times (August 15,
\n1992:2) reports that seventy-nine percent voted in favour of the ordination of women.
\nThis result complied with the two-thirds majority required on an issue declared
\n“controversial.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.326
Threshold uncertainty score0.654

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it