MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2774492088 · doi:10.22584/nr46.2017.007

Again Around the Maypole

2017· article· en· W2774492088 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Annie Osburn

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Northern Review · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Again Around the MaypoleIn the summertime, when the sun takes the sky captive till you forget there has ever been a winter, you can see everything from the schoolhouse windows.Th e whole town, nothing more than the last stop of a railroad caught between glacier and copper-fi lled mountain, fi lters through the bends in the glass.If anything could grow out here, they would put us to work for a few months and make us useful, but the ground is frozen three feet down and lessons stretch all year while the miners drain the mountain.It is recess, so I stay in the back room, fl ip the pages of an old biology primer, and watch the boys play shortball on the narrow diamond ploughed into the moraine.Th ere are only eight of them, so it isn't much of a game.I watch the younger girls run around the maypole, ducking and jumping and carefully brushing dried mud off the edges of the ribbons.And I watch Lizzy Jennings sneaking out of the workmen's bunkhouse, creeping along beneath the railroad trestle that runs through town, trying to make it back to the door of the schoolhouse unseen.Back home, we never had school during the summer months.Mother would take me (and William, once he was old enough) into town on the streetcar, and we' d explore the city shops for hours before heading back to Mission Hill.But home hasn't been home for three years now.Summer outings here are reduced to the recess hour, and Annie Osburn

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score0.931

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0110.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3470.136

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Northern ReviewSame topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207