MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2774725741 · doi:10.1080/24745332.2017.1403870

A curious case of cough

2017· article· en· W2774725741 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey Marciniuk, D W Cockcroft, Roger L.J. Kennedy, D. Fladeland

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Respiratory Critical Care and Sleep Medicine · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTracheal and airway disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchiectasisMedicinePneumoniaPresentation (obstetrics)BronchoscopySurgeryForeign bodyAspiration pneumoniaForeign body aspirationCase presentationBronchusLungRadiologyRespiratory diseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bronchiectasis may have a varied presentation and differential diagnosis. This case is an unusual presentation and clinical course for bronchiectasis. A 49-year-old male presented with an 8-week history of cough and hemoptysis. Aspiration pneumonia with abscess was diagnosed, and the patient improved with antibiotics. Over the next 13 years, the patient experienced recurrent hemoptysis, leading to a chest CT scan revealing RLL bronchiectasis, attributed to recurrent pneumonias. After 8 years of repeated chest infections, the patient was hospitalized due to a severe RLL pneumonia. Repeat CT scan demonstrated a 4-cm bone in the RLL bronchus. An attempt was made to remove the bone via flexible bronchoscopy; however, this was unsuccessful due to surrounding inflammation. Because of continued severe RLL pneumonias, the patient underwent right lower lobectomy and decortication 2 years later. Within the removed lung, a 4-cm long chicken bone was found. Inhaled foreign objects are a known cause of bronchiectasis, but this case is unique because the likely aspiration occurred at least 21 years previously and went undetected despite frequent interactions with the healthcare system. There are reported cases of foreign bodies causing bronchiectasis, however this was one of the longest time periods in which a foreign body causing bronchiectasis had gone unnoticed before diagnosis. This is a very interesting case of an uncommon presentation and is an excellent reminder of how to diagnose and manage focal bronchiectasis. This case also highlights a potentially curable cause of bronchiectasis if discovered early.RÉSUMÉLa bronchectasie peut se présenter de diverses façons et donner lieu à un diagnostic différentiel. La présentation et l'évolution clinique du cas de bronchiectasie décrit dans cet article sont inhabituelles. Un homme de 49 ans présentait une histoire de toux et d'hémoptysie depuis huit semaines. Une pneumonie par aspiration avec abcès a été diagnostiquée, et l'état du patient s'est amélioré avec des antibiotiques. Au cours des treize années suivantes, le patient a souffert d'hémoptysie récurrente. Une tomodensitométrie a révélé une bronchectasie du lobe inférieur droit, attribuée à des pneumonies récurrentes. Après huit ans d'infections thoraciques à répétition, le patient a été hospitalisé en raison d'une grave pneumonie du lobe inférieur droit. Une nouvelle tomodensitométrie a révélé qu'un os de quatre centimètres se trouvait dans la bronche du lobe inférieur droit. Une tentative de retirer l'os par bronchoscopie flexible a été effectuée, mais elle s'est soldée par un échec en raison de l'inflammation environnante. Dû à la persistance de graves pneumonies du lobe inférieur droit, le patient a subi une lobectomie et une décortication du lobe inférieur droit deux ans plus tard. Un os de poulet de quatre centimètres de longueur a été trouvé dans le poumon retiré. Les objets étrangers inhalés sont une cause connue de bronchectasie, mais ce cas est unique car l'aspiration est vraisemblablement survenue 21 ans plus tôt et n'a pas été détectée malgré les interactions fréquentes avec le système de santé. Des cas de corps étrangers occasionnant une bronchectasie ont été rapportés, mais celui-ci représente l'une des plus longues périodes pendant laquelle un corps étranger ayant occasionné une bronchectasie est passé inaperçu avant le diagnostic. Il s'agit d'un cas très intéressant de présentation inhabituelle, ainsi qu'un excellent rappel de la façon de diagnostiquer et de prendre en charge une bronchectasie focale. Ce cas met aussi en relief une cause potentiellement curable de la bronchectasie si elle est découverte tôt.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Respiratory Critical Care and Sleep MedicineSame topicTracheal and airway disordersFrench-language works237,207