MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 18759: Safety and Cost Effectiveness of Same Day Discharge After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Large Rural Single Center Experience

2015· article· en· W2774759549 on OpenAlexaff
Wah Wah Htun, Rajakrishnan Vijayakrishnan, Alan Awdisho, Ibrahim Syed, Sanjeet Kaur, Beni Verma, Ashley Ferrari, Yvette Henry, James C. Blankenship, Peter B. Berger

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsBerger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineConventional PCIPercutaneous coronary interventionSingle CenterPercutaneousPsychological interventionEmergency medicineSurgeryInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Stable patients (pts) undergoing an uncomplicated elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) typically stay in the hospital overnight after their procedure. Many studies suggest that in carefully selected pts, discharge within hours after the PCI appears to be safe. There are no studies, however, comparing the economic impact of same day versus next day discharge. Objective: We sought to evaluate the safety and economic impact of same day discharge after an uncomplicated PCI compared with those after an overnight observation stay.. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of pts who underwent elective PCI and were discharged the same day vs. next day (from observation status) at Geisinger Medical Center between 1/1/2008 to 9/15/2013. The same-day discharge program for selected pts (“outpatient PCI”) was initiated in 2010. Guidelines for same day discharge included negative troponins at 4 hours; readiness for discharge before 8:00 pm; freedom from CHF; LVEF >40%; live within <60 miles; no impediment to obtaining immediate medical attention after discharge if needed; BMI <40, and no severe aortic regurgitation. Thirty-day outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 1164 elective PCI pts were identified; 280 (24%) were discharged the same day (Group 1) and 884 (76%) stayed overnight (Group 2), by physician preference. The radial route was used in 47% of pts, and increased over time. No same day discharge pts were readmitted within 24 hours. At 30 days, there were no differences between Group 1 vs. 2 in frequency of access site complications (0% vs. 0.01%), peri-procedural MI (0 % vs. 0.006%), urgent care/ED visit or readmission (0.05% vs. 0.08%) (P=NS all comparisons). Stent thrombosis and death did not occur in either group in the first 24 hr post PCI. The average charges were $67,471 for pts discharged the same day, 17% less than the $81,175 for those who spent a night being observed in the hospital (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Same day discharge after an uncomplicated PCI and 4 hour observation period was safe and resulted in significantly reduced charges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research→French-language works237,207→