MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 19634: Myocardial Deformation Findings Suggest Early Diastolic Dysfunction in Preterm Infants and Adaptation to Ongoing Myocardial Diastolic Dysfunction During Maturation

2012· article· en· W2774776968 on OpenAlexaff
Akiko Hirose, Nee Scze Khoo, Khalid Aziz, Najlaa Al-Rajaa, Jutta van den Boom, Winnie Savard, Paul Brooks, Lisa K. Hornberger

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiastoleCardiologyInternal medicineCardiac dysfunctionDiastolic functionHeart failureBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background We have recently demonstrated that the ventricular filling in the preterm infant occurs less so in early diastole than observed in term infants of comparable postnatal age using traditional parameters which are preload sensitive. In the present study we sought to re-explore ventricular function using more preload independent parameters including myocardial deformation and twist to better characterize the evolution of myocardial function following preterm delivery. We hypothesized differences exist in early filling myocardial deformation rates and twist in the preterm heart. Methods We prospectively enrolled preterm infants (PI, n=30; GA 27.43±1.23 weeks) at 28 days of age who were clinically stable. After excluding structural pathology, spectral and tissue Doppler velocity and 2-dimensional deformation assessments were made with comparison to 30 healthy term infants of similar postnatal age (27±6.8 days). In 16 preterm infants, follow up echocardiography was performed near term (corrected GA 38.5±2.3 weeks). Results Compared to healthy controls, PI at 28 days had decreased peak mitral valve (MV) E wave velocity (p<0.05), E/A ratio (p<0.01), annular e’ velocity (p<0.0001), e[[Unable to Display Character: ]]/a[[Unable to Display Character: ]] ratio (p<0.0001), and increased MV E/e’ (p<0.01), and at followup MV e[[Unable to Display Character: ]]/a[[Unable to Display Character: ]] (p<0.05) and E/e’ (p<0.01) remained abnormal compared to controls.There was no significant difference in left ventricular (LV) twist and twist rate, or longitudinal strain and strain rate (SR). Basal circumferential early diastolic SR (eSR), however, was lower in PI at 28days compared to term controls (p<0.01), and there was greater late diastolic SR at followup of PI close to term (p<0.05) Despite higher heart rates in PI at 28 days (162±15 vs. 141±15 bpm), there was no significant linear relationship between HR and any of the functional parameters assessed. Conclusion Myocardial deformation and twist suggest preterm infants have normal left ventricular systolic function. The subtle reduction in early diastolic SR in PI at 28 days supports early diastolic differences from controls. The presence of increased late diastolic SR at followup near term may indicate adaptation to persistent diastolic dysfunction consistent with ongoing myocardial maturational delay in postnatal life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors→French-language works237,207→