Effect of the 1BL.1RS wheat-rye translocation on the androgenic response in spring bread wheat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study was conducted to investigate the effect of the 1BL.1RS wheat-rye-translocation on the androgenic response in spring bread wheat. Therefore, four bread wheat cultivars carrying the translocation, four Greek and three Canadian bread wheat cultivars without the translocation were used. An equal number of anthers from each cultivar, containing microspores in the mid (MU) to late uninucleate (LU) microspore developmental stage, were cultured after cold pre-treatment for seven days at 4°C. W14, 190-2 and the basic MS were used as induction, regeneration, and rooting media respectively. The best androgenic response was recorded in two cultivars carrying the translocation. Only two cultivars lacking the translocation responded to anther culture. It is concluded that the positive effect of the 1BL.1RS translocation on anther culture response of bread wheat cultivars cannot be attributed entirely to its presence because the genetic background of the cultivars carrying the translocation could be also important.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".