MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Frequency and treatment of disease flares among individuals with Crohn's disease

2011· article· en· W2774916668 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer H. Lofland, A Howe, Heidi C. Waters, Deborah Freedman, Jan E. Irvine

Bibliographic record

VenueInflammatory Bowel Diseases · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrohn's diseaseMedicineDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to the American College of Gastroenterology guidelines, corticosteroids are effective in inducing remission, but not in maintaining it, among individuals with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD). However, more than 50% of individuals treated with corticosteroids acutely become steroid dependent or steroid resistant. This study will report the 1) frequency of, 2) severity of, 3) treatment of, and 4) maintenance therapy following disease flares among individuals with CD. The National Health and Wellness Survey, a nationally representative internet-based survey, was administered during the 4th quarter of 2009 to individuals aged ≥ 18 years. This analysis reports results for the cohort of respondents with a self-reported physician diagnosis of CD. T-tests were performed to assess differences between groups. 778 individuals with CD completed the survey (63% female; average age = 46.2 years), and of these, 13%, 18%, and 10% of respondents reported > 1 flares/ week, > 1 flares/month, and one flare/month, respectively. Flares lasted 6.2 days on average with the majority classified as moderate in severity (52%). Among respondents experiencing > 1 flares/week, a significantly (P<0.05) higher percent classified their disease as moderate (21%) or severe (29%) rather than mild (4%) and many used steroids (22%), biologics (16%), or immunomodulators (15%) as maintenance therapy (P =NS). Among respondents experiencing > 1 flare/month, a significantly (P<0.05) higher percent classified their disease as moderate (25%) or severe (26%) rather than mild (12%) and many used biologics (26%), immunomodulators (18%), steroids (15%), or 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs) (15%) as maintenance therapy (P <0.05 for biologic vs. 5-ASA). Disease flares were most often treated by adding a steroid to the current treatment regimen (33%), increasing the dose of the current medication (22%), or adding an antibiotic (19%). A significantly (P<0.05) higher percent of individuals with severe disease reported adding a steroid (54%) or an antibiotic (42%) compared to those with moderate (40%, 21%, respectively) and mild (24%, 14%, respectively) disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInflammatory Bowel DiseasesSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207