MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2774967033

Sediment quality monitoring plan for Quintero Bay

2017· other· en· W2774967033 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy metals in environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBaySedimentPlan (archaeology)Environmental scienceGeologyGeographyOceanographyArchaeologyGeomorphology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marine sediment contamination by persistent pollutants such as heavy metals poses one of the worst problems to marine ecosystems. Currently in Chile, there are no mandatory environmental quality standards for coastal sediments. This is partly due to lack of environmental legislation as well as insufficient toxicity data and appropriate sediment monitoring techniques. 
\nThe Quintero bay, located in Valparaiso province in the coastal area of Central Chile, was used for this study. The industrial complex of Quintero Bay is considered one of the largest in Chile and has approximately 14 companies in current operation, including cement plants, copper smelters, copper concentrators and four coal fueled thermoelectric plants. The aim of this research was to examine the current status of heavy metal pollution of the sediments in Quintero Bay in order to forward the development of any future sediment environmental quality standards (EQS) or monitoring programs in Chile. The study focuses on the heavy metal concentrations in the marine sediments. Several studies of contaminated sediments in Quintero Bay have been carried out and the results obtained from four different sources have been analyzed in this study. 
\nHeavy metal concentrations were determined and compared to existing sediment quality guidelines. Almost all of the results of the previous studies indicate that all metal concentrations, except arsenic and copper, fell within the lower end of the sediment quality guideline range. This may signify that those metals from the sediments pose little to no potential threat to the marine organisms. Based on the Canadian SQGs, arsenic and copper will most likely cause adverse biological effects. The Quintero Bay could be categorized as unpolluted to slightly polluted marine environment, so it is important to monitor and evaluate the possible impacts of heavy metals in the sediments. Since the legislation is not available in Chile, it is advisable to evaluate the results with some of the existing EQS, and use the data for establishing local sediment quality guidelines in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it