The role of ethyl acrylate induced GSH depletion in the rodent forestomach and its impact on MTD and in vivo genotoxicity in developing an adverse outcome pathway (AOP)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adverse outcome pathways (AOP) and mode of action (MOA) frameworks help evaluate the toxicity findings of animal studies and their relevance to humans. To effectively use these tools to improve hazard identification and risk assessments for ethyl acrylate (EA), knowledge gaps in metabolism and genotoxicity were identified and addressed. For EA, hypothesized early key events relate to its irritation potential: concentration dependent irritation and cytotoxicity, progressing to regenerative proliferation and forestomach carcinogenicity after repeated oral bolus application in rodents. The current research quantitated glutathione (GSH) depletion to assess a kinetically-derived maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in the target tissue and used this information to conduct an in vivo genotoxicity study using current methods. In the mouse forestomach, gavage doses of EA caused GSH depletion to 47% of control at 20 mg/kg and 28% at 100 mg/kg. Cellular redox changes and histopathology support saturation of metabolism and an MTD of ∼50 mg/kg. No increases in point mutations or deletions occurred in the stomach or liver following a 28 day treatment of gpt delta transgenic mice at gavage doses up to 50 mg/kg/day. These results provide valuable information for evaluating AOP molecular initiating events or MOA key events for EA and other GSH depleting materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".