MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2775595707 · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2780238

Energy Efficiency on Fully Cloudified Mobile Networks: Survey, Challenges, and Open Issues

2017· article· en· W2775595707 on OpenAlexafffund
Ali Alnoman, Glaucio H. S. Carvalho, Alagan Anpalagan, Isaac Woungang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingRadio access networkBackhaul (telecommunications)Computer networkMobile edge computingServerBase stationScalabilityEfficient energy useMobile computingDistributed computingMobile stationOperating systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fully cloudified mobile network infrastructure, which is featured by the joint deployment of heterogeneous cloud radio access networks and edge computing, will successfully cope with the data deluge by densely deploying virtualized wireless base stations and servers while providing the system design with high flexibility, reliability, availability, and scalability. On the other hand, the massive replication of the wireless and computing infrastructure will significantly increase the energy footprint to prohibitive levels. In order to gain actionable insights on energy-efficiency for a fully cloudified mobile network infrastructure, this paper first presents a comprehensive survey of the recent research breakthroughs on each building block of the system, namely: remote radio heads, baseband unit pool, fronthaul, backhaul, HetNet, and edge and cloud computing. Next, we consolidate the discussion with the challenges and open issues of a joint operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications Surveys & TutorialsSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207