MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2775595707 · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2780238

Energy Efficiency on Fully Cloudified Mobile Networks: Survey, Challenges, and Open Issues

2017· article· en· W2775595707 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingRadio access networkBackhaul (telecommunications)Computer networkMobile edge computingServerBase stationScalabilityEfficient energy useMobile computingDistributed computingMobile stationOperating systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fully cloudified mobile network infrastructure, which is featured by the joint deployment of heterogeneous cloud radio access networks and edge computing, will successfully cope with the data deluge by densely deploying virtualized wireless base stations and servers while providing the system design with high flexibility, reliability, availability, and scalability. On the other hand, the massive replication of the wireless and computing infrastructure will significantly increase the energy footprint to prohibitive levels. In order to gain actionable insights on energy-efficiency for a fully cloudified mobile network infrastructure, this paper first presents a comprehensive survey of the recent research breakthroughs on each building block of the system, namely: remote radio heads, baseband unit pool, fronthaul, backhaul, HetNet, and edge and cloud computing. Next, we consolidate the discussion with the challenges and open issues of a joint operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it