MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2776417941 · doi:10.1002/pbc.26929

Modifying bone mineral density, physical function, and quality of life in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

2017· article· en· W2776417941 on OpenAlexaff
Cheryl L. Cox, Liang Zhu, Sue C. Kaste, Kumar Srivastava, Linda Barnes, Paul C. Nathan, Robert J. Wells, Kirsten K. Ness

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Blood & Cancer · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsMedicineBone mineralQuality of life (healthcare)Lymphoblastic LeukemiaBone densityRandomized controlled trialInternal medicinePhysical therapyLeukemiaOsteoporosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The early effects of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) include decreased physical function, bone mineral density (BMD/g/cm 2 ), and health‐related quality of life (HRQL). We assessed the capacity of a physical therapy and motivation‐based intervention, beginning after diagnosis and continuing through the end of treatment, to positively modify these factors. Procedure A 2.5‐year randomized controlled trial of 73 patients aged 4–18.99 years within 10 days of ALL diagnosis assessed BMD at baseline (T 0 ) and end of therapy (T 3 ), strength, range of motion, endurance, motor skills, and HRQL at baseline (T 0 ), 8 (T 1 ), 15 (T 2 ), and 135 (T 3 ) weeks. Results There were no significant changes between groups (intervention, n = 33; usual care, n = 40) in BMD ( P = 0.059) at T 3 or physical function and HRQL at T 0 –T 3 . While BMD declined in both the intervention (T 0 = −0.21, T 3 = −0.55) and usual care (T 0 = −0.62, T 3 = −0.78) groups, rates of decline did not differ between groups ( P = 0.56). Univariate analysis (n = 73) showed associations of higher T 3 bone density with body mass index T 1 ( P = 0.01), T 2 ( P = <0.0001), T 3 ( P = 0.01), T 3 ankle flexibility/strength ( P = 0.001), and T 2 parent ( P = 0.02)/T 0 child ( P = 0.03) perceptions of less bodily pain. Conclusions The intervention delivered during treatment was not successful in modifying BMD, physical function, or HRQL. Physical activity, at the level and intensity required to modify these factors, may not be feasible during early treatment owing to the child's responses to the disease and treatment. Future studies will consider intervention implementation during late maintenance therapy, extending into survivorship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Blood & CancerSame topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207