Ensino do processo de enfermagem na academia: relato à luz de Maguerez
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMOObjetivo: descrever a experiência de discentes no desenvolvimento de uma atividade na disciplina de Processo de Cuidar na Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. Método: estudo qualitativo, descritivo, do tipo relato de experiência. Utilizou-se o Arco de Maguerez, a partir da questão: Quais as fragilidades no ensino do processo de Enfermagem na Academia? Resultados: a Enfermagem evolui em a busca de diversas habilidades, saberes e fazeres profissionais. Assim, o ensino do processo de Enfermagem, em sua maioria, ainda está relacionado à transmissão de bases conceituais, com fragmentação da construção do conhecimento, o que tem contribuído para a falta de significado. Conclusão: as fragilidades no ensino do processo de Enfermagem na academia tinham resultado em dificuldades de implantação e de adesão nos serviços públicos e privados e há a necessidade de refletir acerca da fragmentação entre teoria e prática. Descritores: Enfermagem; Ensino; Processos de Enfermagem.ABSTRACTObjective: to describe the experience of students in the development of an activity in the discipline of Caring Process in Nursing Graduate Program. Method: qualitative, descriptive study, of the type of experience report. It was used the Arch of Maguerez, from the question: What weaknesses in the teaching of the process of Nursing in the Academy? Results: Nursing evolves in search of several skills, knowledge and professional practices. Thus, the teaching of the Nursing process, for the most part, is still related to the transmission of conceptual bases, with fragmentation of the construction of knowledge, which has contributed to the lack of meaning. Conclusion: weaknesses in the teaching of the nursing process in the academy had resulted in difficulties of implementation and adherence in public and private services and there is a need to reflect on the fragmentation between theory and practice. Descriptors:Nursing; Teaching; Nursing Processes.RESUMENObjetivo: describir la experiencia de los estudiantes en el desarrollo de una actividad en la disciplina de Proceso de Cuidar en el Postgrado en Enfermería. Método: estudio cualitativo, descriptivo, del tipo relato de experiencia. Se utilizó el Arco de Maguerez, a partir de la cuestión: ¿Cuáles son las fragilidades en la enseñanza del proceso de Enfermería en la Academia? Resultados: la Enfermería evoluciona en la búsqueda de diversas habilidades, saberes y haceres profesionales. Así, la enseñanza del proceso de Enfermería, en su mayoría, todavía está relacionada a la transmisión de bases conceptuales, con fragmentación de la construcción del conocimiento, lo que ha contribuido a la falta de significado. Conclusión: las fragilidades en la enseñanza del proceso de Enfermería en la academia habían resultado en dificultades de implantación y de adhesión en los servicios públicos y privados y que hay la necesidad de reflexionar acerca de la fragmentación entre teoría y práctica. Descriptores: Enfermería; Enseñanza; Procesos de Enfermería.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".