On Mediation and Fragmentation: The Translator in Valeria Luiselli’s Los ingrávidos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Teniendo en cuenta las voces narrativas que traducen, la estructura y la geografía, el presente artículo examina la función de la traducción en la novela Los ingrávidos (2011) de Valeria Luiselli. Luiselli representa a los traductores de la novela como personajes liminales y efímeros que median el intercambio cultural; en el proceso de la traducción, el lector puede ver que la identidad de los tres narradores se fractura al incorporarse a las vidas y los espacios geográficos de otros personajes. Las múltiples capas de traducción representadas en Los ingrávidos, destacan, pues, la fragmentación y transformación de identidad experimentadas por estas figuras intermediarias. Palabras clave: traducción, identidad, geografía, intertextualidad, fragmentación In consideration of narrative voices that translate, structure, and geography, this article examines the function of translation within Valeria Luiselli’s novel Los ingrávidos (2011). Luiselli represents translators in the novel as liminal and ephemeral characters that mediate cultural exchange; in the process of translation, the reader can see that the identity of the three narrators fractures as they are incorporated into the lives and spaces of others. The multiple levels of translation represented in Los ingrávidos, then, highlights the fragmentation and transformation of identity that is experienced by these intermediary figures. Keywords: translation, identity, geography, intertextuality, fragmentation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".