MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2776756978 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.11.130

From high-energy demands to nZEB: the retrofit of a school in Catalonia, Spain

2017· article· en· W2776756978 on OpenAlexaff
Umberto Berardi, Mauro Manca, P. Casaldàliga, Pich-Aguilera Felipe

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuditContext (archaeology)Metropolitan areaEnergy consumptionArchitectural engineeringEfficient energy useEnvironmental economicsEngineeringBusinessCivil engineeringGeographyEconomicsAccounting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since existing buildings are responsible for almost 40% of the energy consumption, a major focus in the construction sector is represented by building energy-saving retrofits. Considering the limited current economic possibilities in the construction market, the retrofit of existing buildings has become a target for both private actors and public administrations in most of European countries. In this context, the province of Catalonia in Spain is defining strategic plans and guidelines to help energy retrofits according to nZEB criteria. In this framework, the present paper evaluates the effectiveness of a series of strategies considered in the energy refurbishment of a school located in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona. Firstly, the study reports the results of an extensive (level three) energy audit. This data is then used to create a reliable energy simulation model. A set of possible interventions is hence investigated considering technical feasibility, cost, and potential energy saving and indoor comfort benefits. Results show the actual possibility of reaching the nZEB standard at the end of the refurbishment of this high-energy consuming building. Finally, the case study is discussed as a valuable example for promoting energy retrofits in Catalonia and beyond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy ProcediaSame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207