On the Reform of the Administrative System of Byzantium’s Possessions in the Crimea in the Last Quarter of the 6th Century
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Byzantine domination over Crimea was reinforced during the reign of Justinian I (527–565) who, according to Prokopios of Caesarea, fortified Cherson and the Bosporus. The emperor also built two castles on the coast, Aluston (mod. Aluşta) and Gorzoubites (mod. city Gurzuf) and fortified a country or region named Dori in the mountainous area, where the Goths and the Alans lived. In 571 or after 572 the steppes bordering with the Bosporus between Meotid and the Caucasian mountains were captured by the Turks. The inscriptions from Cherson and Taman indicate the reaction of Byzantium to a new threat. Justin II established a new frontier ducat in Crimea and subordinated the civil administration and Byzantine troops in Crimea to the doux of Cherson. Around 579, the Turks appear in front of the walls of Cherson. In 581 the kagan of the Turkic peoples died and they left Crimea. During the reign of the emperor Mauricius (582-602) they built fortresses in south-western Crimea, on the plateau of Eski Kermen, Bakla and Chufut Kale. The emperor subdued the Bosporus and south-western Crimea to the doux of Cherson. As the result of fortification, building the region of Dori was divided into districts, called Klimata or Archontiai, centred on the fortress where the archon resided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it