Principles of a multistack electrochemical wastewater treatment design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Electrolyzer stacks in a bipolar architecture (cells connected in series) are desirable since power provided to a stack can be transferred at high voltages and low currents and thus the losses in the power bus can be reduced. The anode electrodes (active electrodes) considered as part of this study are single sided but there are manufacturing cost advantages to implementing double side anodes in the future. One of the main concerns with a bipolar stack implementation is the existence of leakage currents (bypass currents). The leakage current is associated with current paths that are not between adjacent anode and cathode pairs. This leads to non uniform current density distributions which compromise the electrochemical conversion efficiency of the stack and can also lead to unwanted side reactions. The objective of this paper is to develop modelling tools for a bipolar architecture consisting of two single sided cells that use single sided anodes. It is assumed that chemical reactions are single electron transfer rate limited and that diffusion and convection effects can be ignored. The design process consists of the flowing two steps: development of a large signal model for the stack, and then the extraction of a small signal model from the large signal model. The small signal model facilitates the design of a controller that satisfies current or voltage regulation requirements. A model has been developed for a single cell and two cells in series but can be generalized to more than two cells in series and to incorporate double sided anode configurations in the future. The developed model is able to determine the leakage current and thus provide a quantitative assessment on the performance of the cell.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".