Feasibility of the Redox Sulfur Recovery Process using Heteropoly Molybdophosphate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The feasibility of the removal of sulfide species using acid solutions of 12-molybdophosphoric acid was studied. The key factor in this purification process is the formation of a hydrogen-bonded structure between the hydrogen sulfide species and the bridging oxygen atom of the MoO6 octahedrons of the molybdophosphate complexes. The number of bridging oxygen atoms depends of the pH. Consequently, the efficiency of the process is also largely dependent on the pH. Most of the literature focuses on the redox potentials for the purification process. The slope of the redox pair S/H2S and the molybdophosphate complexes is -59 pH/mV. The differences between the redox potentials do not fluctuate with the pH, which indicates that the oxidation of H2S by molybdophosphate complexes is spontaneous in all pH intervals but does not explain why the efficiency decreases at high pH. In summary, the Keggin-type structure contributes to the efficient removal of sulfide because this structure contains the maximum number of bridging oxygen atoms. The solubility of H2S gas is lower in acidic media. This drawback severely restricts the performance of the purification process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".