MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2777409663 · doi:10.1080/24734306.2017.1408876

Unintentional ingestion of black henbane: two case reports

2017· article· en· W2777409663 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tahireh A. Shams, Sophie Gosselin, Ryan Chuang

Bibliographic record

VenueToxicology Communications · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPoisoning and overdose treatments
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTropaneIngestionAsymptomaticConfusionContext (archaeology)ScopolamineMedicineAnesthesiaInternal medicinePsychologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Black henbane (Hyoscyamus niger) is a member of the nightshade family and an invasive species that grows world-wide, including in Canada. Black henbane is toxic due to its tropane alkaloid contents: hyoscyamine, scopolamine (hyoscine), and atropine. We present two cases of unintentional, acute henbane poisoning. A 65-year-old woman and her 71-year-old husband presented to the emergency department with tachycardia, confusion, hallucinations, and urinary retention after eating a plant thought to be a parsnip from their garden, later identified by family as black henbane. During admission, the woman developed an asymptomatic new left bundle branch block with no other signs of ischemia. Both patients were managed supportively; their toxidromes resolved within 36-48 hours. These cases illustrate the rapid antimuscarinic effects associated with black henbane poisoning. This is the first report describing a new left bundle branch block in the context of black henbane poisoning. However, no published reports of sodium channel activity with any of the constituents was found. Increased public information is needed to educate individuals on the recognition of these mimic plants, as well as the dangers of ingestion, given their ubiquity in private gardens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueToxicology CommunicationsSame topicPoisoning and overdose treatmentsFrench-language works237,207