MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2777903690 · doi:10.1007/s00268-017-4413-9

The Use of a Pre‐operative Carbohydrate Drink in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective, Non‐inferiority, Cohort Study

2017· article· en· W2777903690 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Laffin, Shuai Li, Rondald Brisebois, Peter Senior, Haili Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Surgery · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEnhanced Recovery After Surgery
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusProspective cohort studyEveningCardiac surgeryVascular surgeryInternal medicineCohortPopulationSurgeryCarbohydrateEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Pre‐operative fasting leads to insulin resistance and increased metabolic stress in non‐diabetic patients. Consumption of a carbohydrate drink may alleviate these deleterious effects. Patients with diabetes mellitus represent over 15% of the surgical population, yet concerns over hyperglycemia and aspiration have excluded patients with diabetes mellitus from studies assessing the utility of pre‐operative carbohydrate drinks. Objective To assess for a clinically significant increase in pre‐operative blood glucose concentration (defined as >2 mmol/L) in patients with diabetes consuming a pre‐operative carbohydrate drink. Methods A prospective observational non‐inferiority cohort study of 106 subjects with diabetes mellitus was undertaken to assess the effect of consuming a pre‐operative carbohydrate drink in surgical patients. All patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing surgery (including but not limited to cardiac, neurologic, urologic, and general surgical procedures) were enrolled. Subjects were instructed to consume two carbohydrate‐rich drinks, one before sleeping the evening prior to surgery and another on the day of surgery. Results In total, 43% of subjects were fully compliant with the pre‐operative carbohydrate drink regimen. There were no significant differences between the fully compliant and non‐compliant subjects with respect to baseline characteristics. Consumption of a pre‐operative carbohydrate drink was determined to be non‐inferior to fasting in terms of pre‐operative blood glucose concentration (absolute difference 0.23 mmol/L, 95% CI: −1.00 to 1.45 mmol/L, pnon‐inferiority < 0.01). Neither group was found to be superior in terms of pre‐operative blood glucose concentration, hyperglycemia, or length of stay. Conclusions These findings function as a step toward ensuring pre‐operative carbohydrate drinks are safe in patients with diabetes undergoing surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of SurgerySame topicEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryFrench-language works237,207