The Utility of the Laboratory Work Up at the Time of Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Serological testing is routinely performed in the work up for a diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) to exclude pathologies with similar clinical phenotypes. OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of serological workup that changes the primary diagnosis and/or clinical management for patients presenting with signs of ALS. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients from the Calgary Neuromuscular Intake Clinic in which the neurologist working diagnosis post-assessment is ALS. Charts from 2012 to 2016 with completed standard serological workup were reviewed. The proportion of abnormal results per investigation was determined and whether it resulted in a change in diagnosis and/or clinical management. RESULTS: A total of 276 charts were reviewed and 85 met full inclusion criteria. Serum creatine kinase (35%), vitamin B12 (18%), complete blood count with differential (11%), and parathyroid hormone (10%) were the among the investigations that had a proportion of abnormal results greater than 5%. Only 6% of patients had an abnormal result that qualified for a change in their clinical management none of which changed the primary diagnosis of ALS. CONCLUSIONS: Standard serological investigations in the work-up for a patient with ALS may have low utility from a diagnostic and management perspective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".