Resenha de Renaissances de la Rhétorique. Perelman aujourd’hui, de Angenot, Bernier & Côté
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p class="EIDA-caputresumo">Trata-se da resenha da obra <em><span lang="ES-TRAD">Renaissances de la rhétorique. Perelman aujourd’hui, </span></em>organizada por Marc Angenot, Marc André Bernier e Marcel Côté. Tal publicação é fruto de reflexões empreendidas por pesquisadores de diferentes universidades acerca da obra de Perelman, no Colóquio realizado na Universidade de Quebec em Trois-Rivières, em 2012. O livro é constituído de cinco capítulos, sendo quatro destes compostos de dois textos e um deles de três, além de um prefácio e um posfácio, em um total de 13 textos. A partir de diferentes lugares de enunciação, os autores atestam a importância da herança perelmaniana dando ênfase a noções-chave que perpassaram as reflexões do filósofo e se assentaram, em especial, no <em>Tratado da Argumentação: a Nova retórica</em>, livro que constitui o ponto de partida para os debates.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".